BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//EuroSEAS 2019//EN
X-WR-CALNAME:EuroSEAS 2019
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T154600
UID:grounding-alternative-ontologies-towards-a-political-ecology-of-animism-1
SUMMARY:Grounding “Alternative Ontologies”: Towards a Political Ecology of Animism (1)
LOCATION:Room 1.501
DESCRIPTION:Our panel seeks to bring into dialogue two popular approaches i
 n Southeast Asian studies which do not talk much to one another, at least c
 onceptually: materialist-oriented political ecology and, recently blooming,
  “new animist” studies focusing more on ontological approaches. Such a dial
 ogue is all the more necessary for its potential to turn into a powerful co
 nversation on a common denominator of both approaches: a more or less expli
 cit concern with the disruptive implications of capitalist modernization an
 d alternatives to it. We invite contributions which further the discourse o
 n how “animism” and other non-naturalist ontologies like analogism can be c
 ast in political ecological terms with regard to Southeast Asia. Papers may
  be empirical and/or conceptual in nature but should explicitly address the
  political-economic implications of ontologies or the impacts of ecological
 , political and socio-economic changes on ontologies; they might choose to 
 deal with the following questions:\n\n- How do recent studies on animism in
  Southeast Asia fit into a political-ecological, historical-materialist fra
 me of reference? E.g.: How do alternative ontological concepts of the envir
 onment relate to issues of enclosure, primitive accumulation, resettlement,
  migration, urbanization, commodification or class struggle?\n- How are Sou
 theast Asian animisms actively involved in processes of “modernization”? Ho
 w do they further – or undermine – specific hegemonic projects?\n- How do c
 hanges in the physical landscape such as mining or logging and related poli
 tical and socio-economic processes affect and interact with ontologies? How
  do ontologies interplay with changing physical landscapes over time? How d
 o people maintain and renegotiate their relationships with the non-human wo
 rld under change?\n- Are there potential alternative trajectories, or “conc
 rete utopias”, arising from an integration of both perspectives, e.g. when 
 looking at a specific empirical case, or by comparison?\n\nAn outcome of th
 is panel should be a joint publication as special journal issue or antholog
 y.
URL:https://euroseas2019.org/program/panels/grounding-alternative-ontologies-towards-a-political-ecology-of-animism
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20190911T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20190911T103000
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T154600
UID:grounding-alternative-ontologies-towards-a-political-ecology-of-animism-2
SUMMARY:Grounding “Alternative Ontologies”: Towards a Political Ecology of Animism (2)
LOCATION:Room 1.501
DESCRIPTION:Our panel seeks to bring into dialogue two popular approaches i
 n Southeast Asian studies which do not talk much to one another, at least c
 onceptually: materialist-oriented political ecology and, recently blooming,
  “new animist” studies focusing more on ontological approaches. Such a dial
 ogue is all the more necessary for its potential to turn into a powerful co
 nversation on a common denominator of both approaches: a more or less expli
 cit concern with the disruptive implications of capitalist modernization an
 d alternatives to it. We invite contributions which further the discourse o
 n how “animism” and other non-naturalist ontologies like analogism can be c
 ast in political ecological terms with regard to Southeast Asia. Papers may
  be empirical and/or conceptual in nature but should explicitly address the
  political-economic implications of ontologies or the impacts of ecological
 , political and socio-economic changes on ontologies; they might choose to 
 deal with the following questions:\n\n- How do recent studies on animism in
  Southeast Asia fit into a political-ecological, historical-materialist fra
 me of reference? E.g.: How do alternative ontological concepts of the envir
 onment relate to issues of enclosure, primitive accumulation, resettlement,
  migration, urbanization, commodification or class struggle?\n- How are Sou
 theast Asian animisms actively involved in processes of “modernization”? Ho
 w do they further – or undermine – specific hegemonic projects?\n- How do c
 hanges in the physical landscape such as mining or logging and related poli
 tical and socio-economic processes affect and interact with ontologies? How
  do ontologies interplay with changing physical landscapes over time? How d
 o people maintain and renegotiate their relationships with the non-human wo
 rld under change?\n- Are there potential alternative trajectories, or “conc
 rete utopias”, arising from an integration of both perspectives, e.g. when 
 looking at a specific empirical case, or by comparison?\n\nAn outcome of th
 is panel should be a joint publication as special journal issue or antholog
 y.
URL:https://euroseas2019.org/program/panels/grounding-alternative-ontologies-towards-a-political-ecology-of-animism
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20190911T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20190911T123000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR