Grounding “alternative ontologies”: Towards a political ecology of animism

Type

Double Panel

Part 1

Session 1
Wed 09:00–10:30 Room 1.501

Part 2

Session 2
Wed 11:00–12:30 Room 1.501

Conveners

Discussant

Abstract

Our panel seeks to bring into dialogue two popular approaches in Southeast Asian studies which do not talk much to one another, at least conceptually: materialist-oriented political ecology and, recently blooming, “new animist” studies focusing more on ontological approaches. Such a dialogue is all the more necessary for its potential to turn into a powerful conversation on a common denominator of both approaches: a more or less explicit concern with the disruptive implications of capitalist modernization and alternatives to it. We invite contributions which further the discourse on how “animism” and other non-naturalist ontologies like analogism can be cast in political ecological terms with regard to Southeast Asia. Papers may be empirical and/or conceptual in nature but should explicitly address the political-economic implications of ontologies or the impacts of ecological, political and socio-economic changes on ontologies; they might choose to deal with the following questions:

  • How do recent studies on animism in Southeast Asia fit into a political-ecological, historical-materialist frame of reference? E.g.: How do alternative ontological concepts of the environment relate to issues of enclosure, primitive accumulation, resettlement, migration, urbanization, commodification or class struggle?
  • How are Southeast Asian animisms actively involved in processes of “modernization”? How do they further – or undermine – specific hegemonic projects?
  • How do changes in the physical landscape such as mining or logging and related political and socio-economic processes affect and interact with ontologies? How do ontologies interplay with changing physical landscapes over time? How do people maintain and renegotiate their relationships with the non-human world under change?
  • Are there potential alternative trajectories, or “concrete utopias”, arising from an integration of both perspectives, e.g. when looking at a specific empirical case, or by comparison?

An outcome of this panel should be a joint publication as special journal issue or anthology.